heat wave: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weather
Weight: 0.64
, form
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.59
Siblings heat
Weight: 0.36
, cold weather
Weight: 0.35
, tidal wave
Weight: 0.35
, hot weather
Weight: 0.34
, humidity
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be dangerous 0.99
be dangerous to health 0.87
be dangerous to human health 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(weather, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(weather, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(weather, be dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(weather, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weather, be dangerous)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(weather, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tidal wave, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hot weather, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(cold weather, be dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(weather, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(weather, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hot weather, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hot weather, is dangerous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(cold weather, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cold weather, be dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(tidal wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tidal wave, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(heat wave, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(heat wave, be dangerous)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(heat wave, be dangerous)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(heat wave, be dangerous)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(heat wave, be dangerous to health)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(heat wave, be dangerous to health)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(heat wave, be dangerous to health)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(heat wave, be dangerous to human health)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(heat wave, be dangerous to human health)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heat wave, be dangerous to human health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, be dangerous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, be dangerous to health)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, be dangerous to human health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weather, be dangerous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(weather, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cold weather, be dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot weather, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tidal wave, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(weather, is dangerous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(heat wave, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(weather, be dangerous)