heater: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ventilation system
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.55
Siblings electric heater
Weight: 0.62
, stove
Weight: 0.61
, radiator
Weight: 0.56
, dryer
Weight: 0.51
, furnace
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at office build 0.88
be at office complex 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(ventilation system, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(heater, be at office)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ventilation system, be at office complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(heater, be at office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ventilation system, be at office complex)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ventilation system, be at office build)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(ventilation system, be at office build)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(ventilation system, be at office complex)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(ventilation system, be at office build) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(heater, be at office)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(ventilation system, be at office complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(heater, be at office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(heater, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heater, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(heater, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ventilation system, be at office build)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ventilation system, be at office complex)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ventilation system, be at office build)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(heater, be at office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ventilation system, be at office complex)