heater: be placed at lower level

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
, heating element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radiator
Weight: 0.56
, heating
Weight: 0.35
, furnace
Weight: 0.34
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.34
, toaster
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be placed at lower level 1.00
be placed at level 0.95
be placed near floor 0.81
be best placed on floor 0.80
be best placed on floor of room 0.77
be in houses placed 0.77
be placed on walls 0.76
be placed under windows 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(radiator, be placed under windows)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(radiator, be placed under windows)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(radiator, be placed under windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(heater, be placed at level)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(heater, be placed at level)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(heater, be best placed on floor)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(heater, be best placed on floor)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(heater, be best placed on floor)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(heater, be best placed on floor of room)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(heater, be in houses placed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(heater, be best placed on floor of room)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(heater, be in houses placed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(heater, be best placed on floor of room)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(heater, be in houses placed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(heater, be placed on walls)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(heater, be placed on walls)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(heater, be placed near floor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(heater, be placed on walls)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(heater, be placed near floor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(heater, be placed near floor)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(heater, be placed at level)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(heater, be in houses placed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(heater, be placed at level)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(heater, be best placed on floor of room)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(heater, be placed on walls)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(heater, be best placed on floor)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(heater, be placed under windows)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(heater, be placed under windows)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(heater, be placed under windows)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(heater, be placed near floor)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be placed under windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(heater, be placed at lower level)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(heater, be placed at lower level)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(radiator, be placed under windows)