heater: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
, heating element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings radiator
Weight: 0.56
, heating
Weight: 0.35
, furnace
Weight: 0.34
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.34
, toaster
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality better 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heater, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(heater, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(heater, has quality better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heater, has quality better)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heater, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(heater, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(heater, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)