heating element: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.69
, part
Weight: 0.68
, layer
Weight: 0.64
, feature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heat
Weight: 0.65
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.63
, radiator
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.57
, induction
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(heating element, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(radiator, get hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heating element, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(radiator, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(radiator, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heating element, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(heating element, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(heating element, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(heating element, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(heating element, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(heating element, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(heating element, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(heating element, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(radiator, get hot)