heating: be expensive cooling

Related concepts

Parents	ventilation system Weight: 0.66 , need Weight: 0.65 , variable Weight: 0.61 , cost Weight: 0.60 , factor Weight: 0.59
Siblings	furnace Weight: 0.57 , heater Weight: 0.35 , plumbing Weight: 0.33 , air conditioning Weight: 0.33 , insulation Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive cooling	1.00
is cooling	0.96
affect cooling	0.93
is faster cooling	0.92
is easier cooling	0.91
be different to heating	0.79
be for underfloor heating beneficial	0.79
be different to heating by convection	0.78
affect heating	0.77
be for underfloor heating	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(insulation, affect cooling)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(insulation, be for underfloor heating beneficial)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(insulation, affect heating)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(insulation, affect cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(insulation, affect cooling)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(insulation, affect heating) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(insulation, affect heating)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(insulation, be for underfloor heating beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(insulation, be for underfloor heating beneficial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(heating, be expensive cooling)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(heating, is cooling)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(heating, is cooling)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(heating, is cooling)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(heating, is faster cooling)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(heating, is easier cooling)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(heating, is faster cooling)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(heating, is cooling)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(heating, is faster cooling)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(heating, is easier cooling)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(heating, is faster cooling)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(heating, is easier cooling)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(heating, be different to heating)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(heating, is easier cooling)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(heating, be different to heating by convection)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(heating, be different to heating by convection)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(heating, be different to heating)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(heating, be different to heating)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(heating, be different to heating by convection)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(heating, be different to heating)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(heating, be different to heating by convection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Salient(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(heating, be expensive cooling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(insulation, affect cooling)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(insulation, affect heating)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(insulation, be for underfloor heating beneficial)