heavy metal: was famous in 2000s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.72
, chemical compound
Weight: 0.69
, metal
Weight: 0.68
Siblings aluminum
Weight: 0.72
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.72
, copper
Weight: 0.71
, gold
Weight: 0.70
, copper sulfate
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
was famous in 2000s 1.00
is popular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(gold, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(gold, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(gold, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(heavy metal, is popular)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(heavy metal, is popular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(heavy metal, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heavy metal, was famous in 2000s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(gold, is popular)