height: have variety in phenotypes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents distance
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.63
, length
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings inch
Weight: 0.59
, width
Weight: 0.35
, diameter
Weight: 0.33
, density
Weight: 0.33
, angle
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have variety in phenotypes 1.00
is heritable 0.78
be considered polygenic trait 0.78
have variety 0.76
is genetic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(height, have variety in phenotypes)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(height, be considered polygenic trait)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(height, be considered polygenic trait)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(height, is genetic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(height, be considered polygenic trait)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(height, is genetic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(height, is genetic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(height, is genetic)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(height, be considered polygenic trait)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(height, have variety in phenotypes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(height, have variety in phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(height, have variety in phenotypes)