helicopter: be at air

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aircraft
Weight: 0.72
, airplane
Weight: 0.60
, weapon
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings paraglider
Weight: 0.36
, drone
Weight: 0.34
, blimp
Weight: 0.34
, ballistic missile
Weight: 0.34
, glider
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at air 1.00
be find in air 0.92
be used to air transportation 0.85
be design to fly through air 0.83
be used to transport thing quickly through air 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(aircraft, be at air)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(helicopter, be at air)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(airplane, be used to air transportation)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(helicopter, be at air)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(airplane, be used to transport thing quickly through air)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(helicopter, be at air)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(airplane, be find in air)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(helicopter, be at air)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(airplane, be design to fly through air)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(helicopter, be at air)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(airplane, be find in air)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(airplane, be design to fly through air)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(airplane, be used to air transportation)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(airplane, be used to transport thing quickly through air)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(aircraft, be at air)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(aircraft, be at air)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be find in air)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be design to fly through air)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be used to air transportation)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(airplane, be used to transport thing quickly through air)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blimp, be at air)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(aircraft, be at air)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(airplane, be find in air)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(airplane, be used to air transportation)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(airplane, be used to transport thing quickly through air)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(airplane, be design to fly through air)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be at air)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blimp, be at air)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(blimp, be at air)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(helicopter, be at air)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(helicopter, be at air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aircraft, be at air)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(airplane, be used to air transportation)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(airplane, be used to transport thing quickly through air)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(airplane, be find in air)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(airplane, be design to fly through air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(blimp, be at air)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aircraft, be at air)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(airplane, be used to air transportation)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(airplane, be used to transport thing quickly through air)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(airplane, be find in air)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(helicopter, be at air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(airplane, be design to fly through air)