helicopter: be more expensive than airplanes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aircraft
Weight: 0.72
, airplane
Weight: 0.60
, weapon
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings black hawk
Weight: 0.60
, chinook
Weight: 0.50
, apaches
Weight: 0.39
, aircraft carrier
Weight: 0.36
, paraglider
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than airplanes 1.00
be better than airplanes 0.96
is better then planes 0.88
is expensive 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(paraglider, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(aircraft carrier, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(aircraft carrier, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(aircraft carrier, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(paraglider, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(paraglider, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be better than airplanes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(helicopter, be better than airplanes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be better than airplanes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(helicopter, be better than airplanes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(helicopter, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(helicopter, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(helicopter, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(paraglider, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than airplanes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aircraft carrier, is expensive)