helicopter: were ivented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aircraft
Weight: 0.72
, airplane
Weight: 0.60
, weapon
Weight: 0.57
, technology
Weight: 0.56
Siblings black hawk
Weight: 0.60
, chinook
Weight: 0.50
, apaches
Weight: 0.39
, aircraft carrier
Weight: 0.36
, paraglider
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were ivented 1.00
were made 0.88
were like like 1800s 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(weapon, were made)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(helicopter, were ivented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(weapon, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(weapon, were made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(weapon, were made)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(helicopter, were ivented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(helicopter, were ivented)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, were made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(helicopter, were made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, were like like 1800s)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(helicopter, were made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(helicopter, were like like 1800s)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(helicopter, were made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(helicopter, were like like 1800s)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(helicopter, were like like 1800s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, were ivented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(helicopter, were ivented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(weapon, were made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(helicopter, were ivented)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(weapon, were made)