helium balloon: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents balloon
Weight: 0.74
, exception
Weight: 0.40
Siblings anomaly
Weight: 0.25
, subject
Weight: 0.25
, overflow
Weight: 0.25
, interrupt
Weight: 0.24
, caracas
Weight: 0.21

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(exception, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(helium balloon, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(exception, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(exception, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(anomaly, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(exception, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(helium balloon, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(anomaly, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(anomaly, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(helium balloon, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(helium balloon, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(helium balloon, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(exception, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(anomaly, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(helium balloon, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(exception, has quality bad)