herpes: be diagnosed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virus
Weight: 0.73
, infection
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, influenza
Weight: 0.37
, hepatitis
Weight: 0.36
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be diagnosed 1.00
be diagnosis 0.81
is asymptomatic 0.76
is incurable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(disease, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(infection, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(infection, be diagnosed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(disease, be diagnosed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(disease, be diagnosed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(infection, be diagnosed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hepatitis, be diagnosed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, is incurable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(disease, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(infection, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(hepatitis, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hepatitis, be diagnosed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lyme disease, is incurable)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, is incurable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(herpes, be diagnosed)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(herpes, is asymptomatic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosis)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(herpes, be diagnosis)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(herpes, be diagnosis)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(herpes, is asymptomatic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(herpes, be diagnosis)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(herpes, is incurable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(herpes, is incurable)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(herpes, is incurable)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(herpes, is asymptomatic)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(herpes, is asymptomatic)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(herpes, is incurable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(infection, be diagnosed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(disease, be diagnosed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hepatitis, be diagnosed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be diagnosed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lyme disease, is incurable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(infection, be diagnosed)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(herpes, be diagnosed)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(disease, be diagnosed)