high: be bad wbc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents low
Weight: 0.67
, track
Weight: 0.58
, word
Weight: 0.50
, point
Weight: 0.49
, film
Weight: 0.49
Siblings falling
Weight: 0.30
, fast car
Weight: 0.30
, heavy
Weight: 0.30
, pressure point
Weight: 0.29
, cross country
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad wbc 1.00
work bad 0.91
has quality bad 0.86
be bad acid 0.78
has quality good 0.76
work capital bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(high, be bad wbc)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(low, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(high, be bad wbc)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(track, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(high, be bad wbc)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(high, be bad wbc)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(low, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(high, be bad wbc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(low, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(low, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(track, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(low, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(low, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(track, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(heavy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(cross country, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(high, be bad wbc)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(low, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(high, be bad wbc)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(track, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(high, be bad wbc)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(high, be bad wbc)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(low, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(high, be bad wbc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(heavy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(heavy, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(cross country, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cross country, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(high, be bad wbc)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(high, work bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(high, work bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(high, work bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad acid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(high, work bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(high, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(high, be bad acid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(high, work capital bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(high, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(high, work capital bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(high, work capital bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(high, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(high, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(high, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(high, be bad acid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(high, work capital bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(high, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(high, be bad acid)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(high, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(high, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(high, be bad wbc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(low, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(low, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(heavy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cross country, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(low, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(low, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(high, be bad wbc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(track, has quality good)