highway: be built with expansion joints

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state highway
Weight: 0.79
, roadway
Weight: 0.66
, bridge
Weight: 0.62
, project
Weight: 0.62
Siblings interstate highway
Weight: 0.80
, street
Weight: 0.62
, freeway
Weight: 0.59
, expressway
Weight: 0.56
, turnpike
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be built with expansion joints 1.00
have expansion joints 0.97
need expansion joints 0.96
have expansion joints in them 0.95
is built 0.79
be built 0.79
built 0.79
be built in water 0.78
was built 0.78
were built 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bridge, have expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bridge, need expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bridge, be built in water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bridge, is built)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bridge, be built)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(bridge, were built)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(bridge, were built)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bridge, is built)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bridge, have expansion joints)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(bridge, need expansion joints)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bridge, have expansion joints)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bridge, need expansion joints)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bridge, is built)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bridge, were built)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(freeway, is built)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(bridge, have expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(bridge, need expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bridge, is built)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(bridge, be built in water)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(bridge, be built)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(bridge, were built)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(freeway, is built)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(freeway, is built)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(highway, be built with expansion joints)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(highway, is built)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(highway, is built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(highway, built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(highway, is built)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(highway, built)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(highway, was built)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(highway, built)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(highway, was built)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(highway, was built)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(highway, is built)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, built)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(highway, was built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bridge, have expansion joints)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bridge, need expansion joints)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bridge, is built)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bridge, be built)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bridge, be built in water)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bridge, were built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(freeway, is built)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bridge, is built)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bridge, need expansion joints)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bridge, be built in water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bridge, have expansion joints)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bridge, be built)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(highway, be built with expansion joints)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bridge, were built)