hiker: has physical part sticks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, person
Weight: 0.49
, user
Weight: 0.49
, athlete
Weight: 0.46
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.32
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.32
, cyclist
Weight: 0.32
, dead person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part sticks 1.00
use sticks 0.90
carry sticks 0.87
walking sticks 0.84
use stick 0.81
use walking stick 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hiker, has physical part sticks)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(hiker, walking sticks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hiker, walking sticks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hiker, walking sticks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hiker, walking sticks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hiker, carry sticks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hiker, use sticks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hiker, use sticks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hiker, use walking stick)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hiker, use stick)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hiker, carry sticks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hiker, carry sticks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hiker, carry sticks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(hiker, use walking stick)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hiker, use stick)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hiker, use sticks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hiker, use walking stick)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hiker, use walking stick)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hiker, use stick)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hiker, use stick)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hiker, use sticks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hiker, has physical part sticks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hiker, has physical part sticks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hiker, has physical part sticks)