hiker: wear bandanas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, person
Weight: 0.49
, user
Weight: 0.49
, athlete
Weight: 0.46
Siblings old woman
Weight: 0.32
, pregnant woman
Weight: 0.32
, cyclist
Weight: 0.32
, dead person
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear bandanas 1.00
wear clothes 0.80
wear thick clothes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cyclist, wear clothes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(cyclist, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(cyclist, wear clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hiker, wear bandanas)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hiker, wear clothes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hiker, wear clothes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hiker, wear clothes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(hiker, wear thick clothes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hiker, wear thick clothes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hiker, wear thick clothes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hiker, wear thick clothes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hiker, wear clothes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hiker, wear bandanas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hiker, wear bandanas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hiker, wear bandanas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(cyclist, wear clothes)