hip: be in women wide

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgery
Weight: 0.64
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.60
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.60
, joint
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shoulder
Weight: 0.36
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.35
, appendectomy
Weight: 0.34
, wrist
Weight: 0.34
, ankle
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in women wide 1.00
be in women 0.83
get wider 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, get wider)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shoulder, get wider) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(shoulder, get wider)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hip, be in women wide)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hip, be in women)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hip, be in women)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hip, get wider)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hip, be in women)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hip, be in women)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hip, get wider)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hip, get wider)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hip, get wider)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hip, be in women wide)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hip, be in women wide)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hip, be in women wide) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(shoulder, get wider)