:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(wrist, is weak)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(shoulder, is weak)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(ankle, become weak)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(wrist, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(wrist, is weak)
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(hip, is weak)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hip, is weak)
Typical implies Plausible
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hip, is weak)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(wrist, is weak)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(shoulder, is weak)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hip, is weak)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ankle, become weak)