historian: organize chronologically history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.62
, writer
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.59
, researcher
Weight: 0.59
, figure
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gibbon
Weight: 0.57
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, author
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
organize chronologically history 1.00
organize thematically history 0.87
use chronology as organizing principle 0.79
write history 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(writer, write history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(historian, organize chronologically history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(writer, write history)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(writer, write history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(writer, write history)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(historian, organize chronologically history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(historian, organize chronologically history)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(historian, organize thematically history)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(historian, organize thematically history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(historian, organize thematically history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(historian, write history)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(historian, write history)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(historian, organize chronologically history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(historian, organize chronologically history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(writer, write history)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(historian, organize chronologically history)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(writer, write history)