historian: use historical thinking skill of interpretation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.62
, writer
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.59
, researcher
Weight: 0.59
, figure
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gibbon
Weight: 0.57
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, author
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use historical thinking skill of interpretation 1.00
have different interpretations 0.81
have interpretations 0.80
interpret historic events 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(historian, have different interpretations)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(historian, have different interpretations)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(historian, interpret historic events)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(historian, have different interpretations)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(historian, interpret historic events)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(historian, interpret historic events)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(historian, interpret historic events)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(historian, have different interpretations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(historian, use historical thinking skill of interpretation)