historian: view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.62
, writer
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.59
, researcher
Weight: 0.59
, figure
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gibbon
Weight: 0.57
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, author
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture 1.00
divide egypt ancient history 0.77
view successes of ancient roman emperor tiberius 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(historian, divide egypt ancient history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(historian, divide egypt ancient history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(historian, view successes of ancient roman emperor tiberius)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(historian, view successes of ancient roman emperor tiberius)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(historian, divide egypt ancient history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(historian, view successes of ancient roman emperor tiberius)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(historian, view successes of ancient roman emperor tiberius)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(historian, divide egypt ancient history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(historian, view tang dynasty as golden age of chinese culture)