history: be considered science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.65
, moment
Weight: 0.64
, region
Weight: 0.64
Siblings roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.33
, nature
Weight: 0.32
, facet
Weight: 0.32
, thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science 1.00
be considered as science 0.98
is science 0.93
be considered social science 0.93
be considered as social science 0.92
be related to science 0.90
be referred as science 0.88
be defined in science 0.87
is social science 0.86
be more important than science 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nature, be related to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(nature, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nature, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(history, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered as science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(history, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered as social science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(history, is social science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(history, be considered as science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(history, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(history, be considered as science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(history, be considered as social science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(history, be considered social science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(history, be considered as science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(history, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(history, be considered social science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(history, be considered as social science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(history, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(history, is social science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(history, be considered social science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(history, be considered as social science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(history, is social science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, is social science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(history, be considered science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(nature, be related to science)