history: be related to social science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.65
, moment
Weight: 0.64
, region
Weight: 0.64
Siblings roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, time
Weight: 0.33
, nature
Weight: 0.32
, facet
Weight: 0.32
, thing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to social science 1.00
is social science 0.96
be considered social science 0.95
be considered as social science 0.94
be related to science 0.94
be defined in social science 0.91
is science 0.87
is social 0.87
differ from other social sciences 0.86
relate to other branches of social science 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nature, be related to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(nature, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nature, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(history, be related to social science)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(history, is social science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(history, be considered social science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(history, be considered as social science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(history, be defined in social science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(history, be considered social science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(history, be considered social science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(history, be considered as social science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(history, be considered as social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(history, be defined in social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(history, is social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(history, is social)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(history, is science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(history, is social)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(history, is social science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(history, be defined in social science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, is social science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(history, relate to other branches of social science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(history, is social)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered social science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(history, be considered as social science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(history, is science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(history, is science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(history, be defined in social science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(history, relate to other branches of social science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(history, relate to other branches of social science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(history, is science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(history, relate to other branches of social science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(history, is social)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to social science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(history, be related to social science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(history, be related to social science)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(nature, be related to science)