hockey game: is famous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.84
, sport
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.67
, event
Weight: 0.66
Siblings football game
Weight: 0.43
, baseball game
Weight: 0.42
, cricket game
Weight: 0.42
, chess game
Weight: 0.42
, tennis game
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
is famous 1.00
is more famous 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sport, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey game, is famous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(sport, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sport, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sport, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hockey game, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hockey game, is famous)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hockey game, is more famous)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey game, is more famous)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hockey game, is more famous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hockey game, is more famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey game, is famous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey game, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(sport, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(hockey game, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(sport, is famous)