hockey player: be at sport event

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, people
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at sport event 1.00
win sport event 0.93
play sport 0.87
letter in sport 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sport, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at sport event)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(athlete, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at sport event)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(athlete, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at sport event)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at sport event)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(athlete, play sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at sport event)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(player, win sport event)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(player, be at sport event)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(athlete, be at sport event)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(athlete, be at sport event)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sport, be at sport event)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sport, be at sport event)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(player, be at sport event)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at sport event)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(player, win sport event)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sport, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(athlete, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(athlete, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(athlete, play sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hockey player, be at sport event)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at sport event)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(sport, be at sport event)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(athlete, be at sport event)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(athlete, be at sport event)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(player, be at sport event)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(athlete, play sport)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(sport, be at sport event)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(athlete, be at sport event)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(athlete, be at sport event)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(player, be at sport event)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hockey player, be at sport event) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(athlete, play sport)
...