hockey player: need power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, team
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
need power 1.00
need speed 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(athlete, need speed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, need power)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(athlete, need speed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(athlete, need speed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, need power)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(football player, need power)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, need power)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(soccer player, need speed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(athlete, need speed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hockey player, need power)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(football player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(football player, need power)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(soccer player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(soccer player, need power)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(basketball player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(basketball player, need power)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(soccer player, need speed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(soccer player, need speed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hockey player, need power)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need speed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hockey player, need speed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(hockey player, need speed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hockey player, need speed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, need power)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(athlete, need speed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(football player, need power)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(basketball player, need power)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(soccer player, need power)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(soccer player, need speed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hockey player, need power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(athlete, need speed)