hockey player: shoulder opponent

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, people
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
shoulder opponent 1.00
best opponent 0.84
serve to his opponent 0.83
guard opponent 0.81
service to her opponent 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(player, best opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hockey player, shoulder opponent)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(player, best opponent)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(player, best opponent)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, service to her opponent)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, guard opponent)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tennis player, serve to his opponent)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(player, best opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hockey player, shoulder opponent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(basketball player, guard opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(basketball player, guard opponent)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tennis player, serve to his opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tennis player, serve to his opponent)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(tennis player, service to her opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(tennis player, service to her opponent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(hockey player, shoulder opponent)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hockey player, shoulder opponent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(player, best opponent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(basketball player, guard opponent)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tennis player, serve to his opponent)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(tennis player, service to her opponent)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hockey player, shoulder opponent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(player, best opponent)