hockey player: use clear tape

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, team
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
use clear tape 1.00
use white tape 0.91
tape sticks 0.86
put tape on sticks 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(goalie, tape sticks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(goalie, tape sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(goalie, tape sticks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hockey player, use clear tape)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, put tape on sticks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hockey player, put tape on sticks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hockey player, put tape on sticks)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, use white tape)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, tape sticks)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, use clear tape)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hockey player, use clear tape)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, use clear tape) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(goalie, tape sticks)