hockey player: use math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, team
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
use math 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, use math)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(basketball player, use math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hockey player, use math)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(basketball player, use math)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(basketball player, use math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hockey player, use math)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(hockey player, use math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(hockey player, use math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hockey player, use math)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, use math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hockey player, use math)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hockey player, use math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, use math)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(basketball player, use math)