hog: has physical part spines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.55
, cattle
Weight: 0.52
, creature
Weight: 0.51
, industry
Weight: 0.50
Siblings pig
Weight: 0.35
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.35
, piglet
Weight: 0.34
, cow
Weight: 0.34
, turkey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part spines 1.00
has physical part muscles 0.79
have back muscles 0.76
have strong muscles 0.76
has physical part skin 0.75
have strong back muscles 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hog, has physical part spines)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(hog, has physical part muscles)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hog, has physical part skin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hog, has physical part skin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hog, has physical part muscles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(hog, has physical part skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(hog, has physical part muscles)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hog, have back muscles)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hog, have strong back muscles)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part skin)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hog, have back muscles)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hog, have strong muscles)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hog, have back muscles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hog, have back muscles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part muscles)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hog, have strong muscles)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(hog, have strong muscles)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hog, have strong back muscles)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hog, have strong back muscles)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hog, have strong back muscles)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hog, have strong muscles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part spines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hog, has physical part spines)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hog, has physical part spines)