hog: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.55
, cattle
Weight: 0.52
, creature
Weight: 0.51
, industry
Weight: 0.50
Siblings pig
Weight: 0.35
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.35
, piglet
Weight: 0.34
, cow
Weight: 0.34
, turkey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hog, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hog, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(guinea pig, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hog, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hog, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hog, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hog, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hog, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hog, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hog, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(hog, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)