hole: be used to see through

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, black hole
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
Siblings asshole
Weight: 0.56
, eye socket
Weight: 0.52
, shortstop
Weight: 0.47
, pond
Weight: 0.31
, boulder
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to see through 1.00
be used to look through 0.93
be used to be in 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(place, be used to be in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hole, be used to see through)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(place, be used to be in)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to be in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(place, be used to be in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hole, be used to see through)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(hole, be used to see through)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hole, be used to look through)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(hole, be used to look through)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hole, be used to look through)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(hole, be used to look through)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hole, be used to see through)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hole, be used to see through)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(place, be used to be in)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hole, be used to see through) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(place, be used to be in)