home depot: be more successful than lowes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.74
, shopping center
Weight: 0.72
, department store
Weight: 0.72
, hardware store
Weight: 0.72
, home
Weight: 0.70
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.37
, convenience store
Weight: 0.36
, corner shop
Weight: 0.36
, shop
Weight: 0.35
, home owner
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more successful than lowes 1.00
be better than lowes 0.88
is successful 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is successful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(convenience store, is successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is successful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(home depot, be more successful than lowes)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(home depot, be better than lowes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(home depot, be better than lowes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(home depot, is successful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(home depot, be better than lowes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(home depot, is successful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be better than lowes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(home depot, is successful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(home depot, is successful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(home depot, be more successful than lowes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(home depot, be more successful than lowes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(convenience store, is successful)