homeless: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.61
, population
Weight: 0.57
, poor people
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.40
, elderly person
Weight: 0.36
, dead person
Weight: 0.34
, young people
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
is social problem 0.85
is issue 0.78
is important issue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(homeless, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(homeless, is social problem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(homeless, is social problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(homeless, is social problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(homeless, is issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(homeless, is social problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(homeless, is issue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(homeless, is important issue)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(homeless, is issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(homeless, is issue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(homeless, is important issue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(homeless, is important issue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(homeless, is important issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(homeless, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(homeless, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(homeless, has state problem)