homeless: have dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.61
, population
Weight: 0.57
, poor people
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings homeless person
Weight: 0.40
, elderly person
Weight: 0.36
, dead person
Weight: 0.34
, young people
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have dogs 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(homeless, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(homeless person, have dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(homeless, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(homeless person, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(homeless person, have dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(homeless, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(homeless, have dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(homeless, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(homeless, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(homeless, have dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(homeless, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(homeless, have dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(homeless, have dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(homeless person, have dogs)