honeybee: be in decline

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.61
, bee
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.47
, honey
Weight: 0.46
Siblings honey bees
Weight: 0.36
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.35
, beetle
Weight: 0.35
, housefly
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in decline 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be in decline)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(honey bees, be in decline)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(honeybee, be in decline)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(honey bees, be in decline)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(honey bees, be in decline)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(honeybee, be in decline)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(honeybee, be in decline)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(honeybee, be in decline)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(honeybee, be in decline)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be in decline)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(honeybee, be in decline)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(honeybee, be in decline)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be in decline)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(honey bees, be in decline)