hooker: be at any large city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.54
, writer
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.52
, time
Weight: 0.51
, character
Weight: 0.49
Siblings pregnant woman
Weight: 0.32
, captain
Weight: 0.32
, old woman
Weight: 0.32
, prostitute
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at any large city 1.00
be at city 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, be at any large city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, be at city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(prostitute, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(prostitute, be at any large city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(prostitute, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(prostitute, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(hooker, be at any large city)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hooker, be at city)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hooker, be at city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hooker, be at city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hooker, be at city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hooker, be at any large city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hooker, be at any large city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(prostitute, be at any large city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hooker, be at any large city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(prostitute, be at city)