hooker: have bad teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.54
, writer
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.52
, time
Weight: 0.51
, character
Weight: 0.49
Siblings pregnant woman
Weight: 0.32
, captain
Weight: 0.32
, old woman
Weight: 0.32
, prostitute
Weight: 0.32
, young man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad teeth 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hooker, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hooker, have bad teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(hooker, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hooker, has physical part teeth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hooker, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(hooker, has physical part teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hooker, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(hooker, has physical part teeth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hooker, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(hooker, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(hooker, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hooker, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hooker, have bad teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hooker, have bad teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hooker, have bad teeth)