hose: zimbabwe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.57
, radiator
Weight: 0.54
, tube
Weight: 0.54
, device
Weight: 0.53
Siblings garden hose
Weight: 0.78
, eustachian tube
Weight: 0.34
, endotracheal tube
Weight: 0.33
, fallopian tube
Weight: 0.33
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
zimbabwe 1.00
is zimbabwe 1.00
come from russia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hose, zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, come from russia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hose, zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(vacuum tube, come from russia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, come from russia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hose, zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hose, zimbabwe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hose, zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hose, zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hose, zimbabwe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hose, zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hose, zimbabwe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hose, zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, come from russia)