hospital: be at urban and metropolitan area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents doctor office
Weight: 0.71
, room
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.62
, emergency
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.61
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.35
, patient
Weight: 0.35
, laundry room
Weight: 0.34
, doctor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at urban and metropolitan area 1.00
be at urban area 0.95
be at city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(community, be at city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(doctor office, be at city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(room, be at city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(room, be at city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(doctor office, be at city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(community, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(doctor office, be at city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(room, be at city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(community, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be at city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(community, be at city)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(doctor office, be at city)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(room, be at city)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hotel room, be at city)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hospital, be at urban area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hospital, be at urban area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban area)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(hospital, be at city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hospital, be at city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hospital, be at urban area)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hospital, be at city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(community, be at city)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(room, be at city)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(doctor office, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hotel room, be at city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(community, be at city)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(room, be at city)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(hospital, be at urban and metropolitan area)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(doctor office, be at city)