hostess: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.56
, corporation
Weight: 0.55
, people
Weight: 0.51
, friend
Weight: 0.51
, girl
Weight: 0.50
Siblings waitress
Weight: 0.32
, bartender
Weight: 0.32
, niece
Weight: 0.32
, lady
Weight: 0.32
, receptionist
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.85
be at in restaurant 0.84
be eat at restaurant 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(girl, be eat at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hostess, be at resturant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(girl, be eat at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(girl, be eat at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at resturant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(waitress, be at in restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(girl, be eat at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hostess, be at resturant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waitress, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(waitress, be at resturant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(waitress, be at in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(waitress, be at in restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hostess, be at resturant)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hostess, be at restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hostess, be at restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hostess, be at restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(hostess, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hostess, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(girl, be eat at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(waitress, be at resturant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(waitress, be at in restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(hostess, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(girl, be eat at restaurant)