hot air: feel thick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air
Weight: 0.73
, heating
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, source
Weight: 0.53
Siblings air conditioner
Weight: 0.37
, fresh air
Weight: 0.37
, hot water
Weight: 0.36
, air horn
Weight: 0.35
, hot spot
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel thick 1.00
be more dense than cold 0.76
is dense 0.76
be less dense than cold air 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(air, is dense)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot air, feel thick)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(air, is dense)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(air, is dense)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(air, is dense)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hot air, feel thick)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(hot air, feel thick)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(hot air, be less dense than cold air)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be less dense than cold air)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hot air, be more dense than cold)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hot air, be more dense than cold)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be more dense than cold)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hot air, feel thick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot air, feel thick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air, is dense)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(hot air, feel thick)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(air, is dense)