hot air: have more volume than cold air

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents air
Weight: 0.73
, heating
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, source
Weight: 0.53
Siblings air conditioner
Weight: 0.37
, fresh air
Weight: 0.37
, hot water
Weight: 0.36
, air horn
Weight: 0.35
, hot spot
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have more volume than cold air 1.00
be less dense than cold air 0.89
be heavier than cold air 0.89
hold more water vapour than cold air 0.88
take up more space than cold air 0.88
be lighter than cold air 0.87
have higher air pressure than colder air 0.87
be more dense than cold 0.85
be less dense than air 0.85
be thinner than cold air 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(air, be heavier than cold air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(air, be lighter than cold air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(air, be lighter than cold air)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(air, be heavier than cold air)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(air, be lighter than cold air)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(air, be heavier than cold air)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(air, be heavier than cold air)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(air, be lighter than cold air)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot air, be heavier than cold air)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(hot air, be heavier than cold air)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be heavier than cold air)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot air, be lighter than cold air)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(hot air, be lighter than cold air)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(hot air, be less dense than cold air)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be lighter than cold air)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be less dense than cold air)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hot air, take up more space than cold air)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hot air, take up more space than cold air)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(hot air, have higher air pressure than colder air)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot air, be thinner than cold air)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hot air, hold more water vapour than cold air)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(hot air, be thinner than cold air)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be thinner than cold air)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hot air, have higher air pressure than colder air)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hot air, be heavier than cold air)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hot air, hold more water vapour than cold air)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(hot air, be lighter than cold air)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hot air, be more dense than cold)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hot air, take up more space than cold air)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hot air, be less dense than air)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hot air, hold more water vapour than cold air)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hot air, be more dense than cold)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hot air, be thinner than cold air)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hot air, hold more water vapour than cold air)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hot air, have higher air pressure than colder air)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hot air, be more dense than cold)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be more dense than cold)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hot air, take up more space than cold air)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hot air, be less dense than air)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have higher air pressure than colder air)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(hot air, be less dense than air)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hot air, be less dense than cold air)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hot air, be less dense than cold air)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hot air, be less dense than air)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(air, be heavier than cold air)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(air, be lighter than cold air)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(air, be heavier than cold air)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(hot air, have more volume than cold air)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(air, be lighter than cold air)