hot chocolate: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.73
, drink
Weight: 0.72
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.67
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.40
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.39
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(chocolate, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chocolate milk, was invented)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(hot chocolate, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chocolate, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(hot chocolate, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(chocolate, was invented)