hot dog: be bad for diabetics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for diabetics 1.00
be bad for gout 0.78
be bad for diet 0.77
contribute to obesity 0.75
contribute to problem of obesity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fast food, contribute to problem of obesity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for diabetics)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(junk food, contribute to obesity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for diabetics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(junk food, contribute to obesity)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(fast food, contribute to problem of obesity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fast food, contribute to problem of obesity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(junk food, contribute to obesity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(fast food, contribute to problem of obesity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for diabetics)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(junk food, contribute to obesity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for diabetics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(hot dog, be bad for diabetics)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(hot dog, be bad for gout)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for gout)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for gout)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for gout)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for diabetics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for diabetics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(junk food, contribute to obesity)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fast food, contribute to problem of obesity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(junk food, contribute to obesity)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(hot dog, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fast food, contribute to problem of obesity)