hot dog: be best serve warm

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, soft drink
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best serve warm 1.00
be good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hot dog, be best serve warm)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(junk food, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be best serve warm)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hot dog, be best serve warm)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hot dog, be good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot dog, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be best serve warm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hot dog, be best serve warm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hot dog, be best serve warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(junk food, be good)