hot dog: be delicious

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, soft drink
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be delicious 1.00
be spicy 0.82
be tasty but not nutritionally beneficial 0.79
be used to flavor taco 0.78
hold salad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(item, hold salad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, be delicious)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(item, hold salad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(item, hold salad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, be used to flavor taco)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, be spicy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(item, hold salad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be delicious)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hot sauce, be used to flavor taco) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, be used to flavor taco)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hot sauce, be spicy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, be spicy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hot dog, be delicious)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hot dog, be tasty but not nutritionally beneficial)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be tasty but not nutritionally beneficial)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be tasty but not nutritionally beneficial)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(hot dog, be tasty but not nutritionally beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, be delicious)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(item, hold salad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hot sauce, be spicy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hot sauce, be used to flavor taco)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hot dog, be delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(item, hold salad)