hot dog: be identified hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be identified hot 1.00
be hot 0.80
be named hot dog 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hot dog, be identified hot)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(hot dog, be hot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hot dog, be hot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be hot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be hot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be named hot dog)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(hot dog, be named hot dog)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hot dog, be named hot dog)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be named hot dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be identified hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hot dog, be identified hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hot dog, be identified hot)