hot dog: have red color

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red color 1.00
has color red 0.99
is color red 0.99
has color pink 0.92
has color green 0.90
be dyed red 0.84
turn gray 0.78
have colored backgrounds 0.78
fade to blue 0.77
have different colored backgrounds 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, has color red)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hot dog, have red color)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(item, fade to blue)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hot dog, have red color)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food, has color red)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(item, fade to blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has color red)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(item, fade to blue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, has color red)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(item, fade to blue)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hot dog, have red color)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(hot dog, have red color)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has color pink)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(hot dog, has color pink)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has color pink)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is color red)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(hot dog, is color red)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hot dog, has color pink)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is color red)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has color red)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(hot dog, has color red)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has color red)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hot dog, has color red)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(hot dog, is color red)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has color green)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(hot dog, has color green)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has color green)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hot dog, has color green)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be dyed red)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(hot dog, be dyed red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be dyed red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hot dog, be dyed red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hot dog, have red color)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, has color red)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(item, fade to blue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, has color red)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(hot dog, have red color)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(item, fade to blue)